Core Values

Rather than detailed implementation §1.2.13b we agree to follow Core Values.

In computer terms - https://www.google.com/#q=declarative+programming - we explain what has to be done rather than how.

Law of the Land

 * We obey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_the_land


 * In the future, we can use https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_waters
 * Current state of floating cities: Helpful Links & Resources
 * If the Law of the Land is not convenient - we try to influence default government to get an exemption.

Strength, Freedom, Independence

 * You join because you want.
 * There will be no marketing manoeuvres.
 * We will live by example and share our values (but to no marketing shenanigans).
 * We will allow Investors to support genesis financially that would allow to obtain more land and establish multiple locations.
 * Dedicated section on Freedom.

Be excellent to each other!

 * https://www.noisebridge.net/wiki/Noisebridge_Vision#Tripartite_Pillars
 * https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Don%27t_be_a_jerk

Love as the driving force
No matter what ask yourself a question - does it come from love?

If love is not a driving factor - think again.

Permaculture and automation
We employ nature and technology to do the hard work

Open-source from the ground-up

 * Processes should be documented, accessible, transparent: Everything In Public
 * Using open-source software and open-source hardware
 * Not being dependent on proprietary technologies
 * Open-source should also apply to legal documents.

Examples of not OK:
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FBX#File_format
 * https://twitter.com/stefek99/status/641898471520387072

Open source licence

 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_Software_Foundation,_Inc._v._Cisco_Systems,_Inc.
 * MIT? Apache?
 * Creative Commons?

WTFPL

 * Some questions need to be clarified: http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/149050/should-i-change-the-name-of-the-wtfpl#comment617889_161949
 * Create new genesis licence
 * According to these core values
 * Based on WTFPL: http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/149050/should-i-change-the-name-of-the-wtfpl#comment617889_161949 (figuring it out)
 * Allowing some non-WTFPL cases as in Everything_In_Public

Communication protocols
Being able to discuss 'tabu' such as ..., money, relationships, ... - they don't teach that in school: Education

No sarcasm, no irony, no rhetorical questions
No kidding, I'm a computer programmer and I talk with computers. As a matter of policy I don't use sarcasm, irony nor rhetorical questions.

The group comes from different countries, has different ages, various cultural background.

RTFM - read the f****** manual
All the information should be easily digestible by new members.

Use of plain english, no lengthy contracts.

We treat all the species well
Animal exploitation on industrial scale is not cool: Freedom

I'm making steps to become vegan - Convert To Veganism - it's about the journey.

Healthy relationship with money
Some high-yield remote work.

Supportive environment to launch innovative projects
Low cost of living + support systems + total immersion + close collaboration = chances of success.

Experimenting polyphasic sleep, brain hacking (nootropics) and peak performance

We think long term
We are here to stay.There will be future generations after us.

Adding value - WIN WIN WIN

 * It's more than 'zero sum' game
 * Creating long-lasting positive impact (we are here to stay)
 * Creating value, see also Wealth Abundance Prosperity
 * There might be an exception - Stock Exchange - where it is actually a zero sum game.

Agility / Flexibility / Adaptability
https://www.google.com/search?q=strongest+smartest+darwin"It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent that survives. It is the one that is most adaptable to change."We need to be able to make decisions fast. Again the example of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish_referendum,_2015"The voter turnout of 7.80 percent was well below the 50-percent threshold required for the referendum results to be legally binding."If there is a prediction of something going terribly wrong we are able to make decisions quickly (in this instance call it off).

Not solving problems that hasn't occurred yet
We have flexible processes allowing us to adapt. We don't have to predict every problem, it's enough to be aware that we can always figure it out.

Fairness

 * We are fair.
 * We don't leave anyone with feeling of being 'unfair'.
 * Being 'unfair' causes grief, anxiety, frustration (a lot of bad stuff).
 * No matter what we ensure all involved parties agree on fundamentals and if there is stuff remaining we handle it in separate document.

Think for yourself

 * This is questionable / controversial and I need to do more reading.
 * Think for yourself as in make decisions that are best to you and your immediate needs.
 * Don't think "they may think that it is a better option" - if you think differently use your own guts - don't think about what else may think.

Don't think too much

 * As per previous point: don't think what other may think.
 * Brain is the most energy consuming part of the body.
 * So don't think too much, don't overanalyse - then you are hungry east, when you are tired sleep - but when you actually do it - be excellent! Share the process, share the notes, document the outcomes. Brain processing power is scarce resource and we should learn from each other.

Secondary
It's more about technical details rather than actual values

No irreversible action can be taken lightly
Always ask what worse could happen? Example:
 * If an action has easy, reversible fix - it is generally safe to apply
 * If an action has long-lasting irreversible consequences - be vigilant
 * I painted roof red, but we prefer white - no harm done - get some paint and re do
 * I cut the 100 year old oak tree - that is not cool

Protecting weak
Law should protect weak - strong will take care of themselves. When in doubt we take the side of weaker. Example:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish_referendum,_2015"Are you in favour of introducing a general rule of resolving doubts regarding the interpretation of taxation law in favour of the tax-payer?"94.51% said yes

1) because it is in favour of voters

2) because it is in favour of weaker side

There is always way to back-off

 * We implement: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cooling-off_period_(consumer_rights)
 * No serious decision can be done once and for all
 * We embrace "cooling off period" - within 3 sleeps we are allowed to cancel the deal.